Thus, instead of perceiving the international system as inherently anarchic, liberalism assumes that there are plenty of opportunities for cooperation. General assumptions of liberalism center on the notion that the rejection of power politics is the only possible outcome of international relations. Remeber that realism is about the individuality of states while liberalism is about the necessity of interdependence and cooperation. The theory of liberalism in international relations directly contradicts the theory of realism. There can be no middle ground or moderation with regard to the scope of power accumulation. The behaviors and actions of these states are directed toward the promotion of their self-interest. States desire power to ensure self-preservation nonetheless. The reason why international relations are anarchic is that there is no supranational authority that would govern the conduct of these states by enforcing rules. The theory of realism in international relations generally assumes that the international system is inherently disorderly and relations are anarchic because primary actors are perpetually locked against a struggle for power and security.Īnother general assumption of this theory is that states are the primary actors in the international politics. Three Major Theories of International Relations 1. Note that the aforementioned theories also correspond to schools of thought in international relations theory because each of them has its own particular group of adherents who have further introduced, developed, and used derivative theories.
0 kommentar(er)
